For the first time in more than five years, the IRS plans to release further cryptocurrency tax guidelines, according to Commissioner Charles P. Rettig.
This guidance comes at the urging of tax professionals and consumers as the crypto and blockchain ecosystem has rapidly evolved in recent years. According to Rettig, the IRS is working on providing clarity for “acceptable methods for calculating cost basis, acceptable methods of cost basis assignment, and the tax treatment of forks.” This article addresses the most important things to watch out for in the new guidance and why they matter.
1. Acceptable Methods for Calculating Cost Basis
The 2014 guidance states that the fair market value for cryptocurrency is determined by converting into U.S. dollars “at the exchange rate, in a reasonable manner that is consistently applied.” However, this leaves considerable questions, as cryptocurrency can widely vary in price and sometimes not have a correlated USD price at all.
There are several different methods for cost basis calculation with other forms of property like trading stocks. The initial guidance does not specifically declare whether or not accounting methods like first-in, first-out (FIFO), average cost basis (ACB) or last-in, first-out (LIFO) would be acceptable for cryptocurrencies.
This gray area has left cryptocurrency investors questioning whether or not their chosen cost basis calculation method could be challenged by the IRS. Software specifically built for crypto taxes often offers users multiple cost basis calculation options, and investors today are using a variety of methods.
Clarification around cost basis calculation is important as different methods can lead to different sizes of gains and losses. For example, in an environment of increasing cryptocurrency prices as we saw with bitcoin in 2019, the LIFO calculation method will lead to a smaller net gain. In this case, your coins acquired at higher cost basis will be sold off first. In turn, this will lead to less money owed on your tax bill. However, we still don’t know whether or not LIFO is an allowable method. Clarification by the IRS around acceptable methods will be important to watch for in the coming guidance.
2. Dealing With Forks, Airdrops and Staking Rewards
In addition to questions surrounding appropriate cost basis calculation methods, there is a list of other events that need clarification for tax purposes, including crypto received from forks, airdrops and staking rewards.
Each of these types of events results in a user receiving an amount of cryptocurrency because he or she already holds another. For example, anyone who held bitcoin on August 1, 2017, can claim a like amount of bitcoin cash, which was born that day. They can also claim the other currencies that subsequently split off from the main chain. This is an example of crypto received from a fork. The 2014 guidance, however, provides no clarity on how these bitcoin taxes should be treated.
This issue gets more complicated when the holder has no say in whether or not they receive or do not receive crypto from a fork or airdrop event. For example, if a taxpayer holds their cryptocurrency with a custodial exchange like Coinbase, any actions that the exchange takes regarding airdropped or forked tokens should not affect the taxpayer unless such actions were undertaken at the direction of the taxpayer.
Things to watch out for as further guidance is released on forks, airdrops and hopefully staking revolve around whether or not these events should be treated as ordinary income at the time of receiving. Clarity is also needed regarding how to determine the fair market value for these cryptocurrencies.
3. Foreign Reporting Requirements
Another hot area of debate among tax professionals within the cryptocurrency community is whether or not holders of cryptocurrencies on foreign exchanges like Binance are subject to foreign reporting requirements via a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
These reporting requirements exist within the U.S. for holders of foregin financial accounts. For example, if you have an account in Switzerland with financial assets over $10,000, you would need to file an FBAR. If the account has more than $50,000 at any time, FATCA requirements also apply and would need to be reported.
It is not explicitly clear whether or not cryptocurrency held on foreign-based exchanges fall into this category. However, the conservative approach for individuals meeting the FBAR/FATCA requirements is to file these documents as penalties for non-reporting can be significant. Many cryptocurrency tax softwares can automatically build and export these forms on your behalf.
It is not clear whether or not the IRS will provide clarification for foreign reporting requirements within the new guidance, as Rettig did not state this as one of the areas of clarification. Either way, it is an important item to look out for when the new guidance is released.
Conclusion
It has been five years since the IRS has spoken on cryptocurrencies. Because the industry is incredibly dynamic and constantly evolving, it can be hard for policy to keep pace. This new guidance that is set to come within the next 30 days will hopefully provide clarity that will make cryptocurrency tax compliance much easier for the average U.S. investor.
The post Op Ed: Three Things to Watch for in Upcoming IRS Cryptocurrency Guidelines appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.
